Ms-22 Question bank (13)
Ms-22 Question bank
Ms-22 june 2010
Written by sales@mbaonlinepapers.com sales@mbaonlinepapers.comMS-22 June, 2010
MS-22 : HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
1.Define HRD. Briefly discuss the changing boundaries of HRD and HRD trends in Asian Countries.
2.What is the concept of career ? Briefly describe the individual and organisational strategies for career development. Explain with suitable example.
3. What are the objectives of compensation cum reward system ? How is assessment done for rewarding employees, discuss with example.
4. What is Self-Renewal System ? Describe the important aspects of development of Internal Self Renewal Facilitators, with suitable examples.
5. Write short notes on any three of the following :
a) Competency Mapping.
b) The Coaching Process.
c) HRD Audit.
d) Knowledge Management in Organisations
(e) Managing Technological changes in work organisation.
Ms-22 june 2011
Written by sales@mbaonlinepapers.com sales@mbaonlinepapers.comMS-22 June, 2011
MS-22 : HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
1. What are the 3 Ss of Organisational Development ? Discuss the Competency based Organisational Development System. Explain with suitable examples.
2. What are the objectives of compensation cum- reward system ? Briefly discuss various components of compensation system, citing suitable examples.
3. How does HRD Audit contribute towards development process of an organisation ? Explain the process of HRD Audit in an organisation.
4.What are the issues in managing technological change in work organisation ? Briefly discuss the role and relationship of HRD in managing technological change.
5. Write short notes on any three of the following :
(a) 360 Degree Appraisal
(b) Mentoring
(c) Role of Trade Unions in HRD
(d) Career Transition and choices
(e) Diversity Management
6. Read the case and answer the questions given at the end :
The HRD programme was decided to be initiated in IOC as a totally fresh and uncontaminated idea. To introduce HRD as a fresh idea was in itself an innovative idea, since the Corporation had well - established Human Resources Management policies and practices. Yet, the very idea was mooted as a concept, accepted as a principle, presented to the top management in the company represented by the Directors and got cleared for introduction as a necessary intervention, considering the growth and development plans of the organisation.
To start with, the road -show of the concept comprised a wide campaign to create extensive awareness that HRD, as an issue, was everybody's baby and that it needs to be properly nurtured and cared for. When the whole objective was explained to critical senior management groups, the concept received wide acceptance. After all, any new idea should be worth looking into ! The top and senior management groups in the Corporation, thus backed and accepted in principle, the process of undertaking a company -wide campaign for the new-look HRD programme. This, no doubt, implied that the established policies will continue to be operated, but are liable to be tested for validity and modified for deficiency, wherever called for. The awareness campaign was set in motion with great vigour and gusto. The initial campaign was concentrated on executives at all iceek. This pre - supposed two things : top management commitment as a vanguard action and executive involvement as a lead group activity. Within a short time, conferences, seminars, workshops and training programmes were designed, drawn -up and delivered throughout the organisation to cover virtually every executive.
What was missed in the process was the large bulk of non- executives. Though there was
a plan to cover the non execuuive involment in the second leg of the campaign, the the very fact intial efforts were going only in the direction of executives created its own rustles amid rambles.
The HRD action groups, who were spearheading and controlling the HRD activities, naturally had to take notice or the message which had come too soon from the non --executive categories of employees. It was, therefore, only natural to recognise that . without waiting for the second leg of the campaign, the need was to advance the campaign schedule and initiate the HRD awareness programme for non- executives.
as well. After : all. the milk has to be given gladly to the baby which started crying ! But the process of covering the large mass of non- executive employees was not an easy task. The number as well as the spread of numerous locations throughout the company made the task to achieve coverage of maximum number of non-executive employees to a one-day "HRD) awareness programme". The programme outline was centrally designed but the specific inputs were left to be decided by the divisional and unit functionaries.
The programme design provided for executives as faculty, who would cover small non - executive groups in lecture and discussion sessions on the whole concept of new FIND programme that the Corporation is contemplating. When the executives speak to the non -executives on any projected company programme, needing involvement of non executives, a pinch of salt is always present ! This was true for the initial awareness programmes organised for non -executives as well. When it became clear that the message was not really going down to the participants, naturally the question arose whether it was worthwhile going ahead with the rest of the programmes covering the large majority of non-executives.
The HRD group stepped in and rolled back their campaign at least temporarily to review whether everything is going to be okay or not. It was the general view that there is a "receptability block" operating in the communication channel between the executive faculty members and the non -executive participants. This has to be overcome if the programme is to give the maximum possible return.
It was one of the ideas to try out the next few programmes with faculty drawn from among the non -executives themselves, rather than the traditional executive faculty. Employees from non - executive category with excellent communication, comprehension and influencing skills were identified and provided with a briefing as to what exactly is the inherent purpose of the awareness programme.
It was a revelation to find a sea - change in the receptability of participants. Although, the programme input was the same, the difference lay in the fact that earlier the executive faculty used to speak to the non - executive participants, whereas now it was the non - executives themselves functioning as faculty, speaking to their own colleagues in a language perceived as their own. We often tend to forget this and end up reaping a harvest much below our expectation.
Therefore, it is worth considering : why settle for a lean harvest when you can afford to have the full harvest ! It is small ideas that often bring big results.
Questions :
(a) What is the problem as you see it ? Elaborate.
(b) List the lessons learnt. What is your recommendation in this situation ?
(c) What is the "receptability block" ? Explain.
(d) What were the changes witnessed ? How did they occur ?
Ms-22 dec 2007
Written by sales@mbaonlinepapers.com sales@mbaonlinepapers.comMS-22 Dec, 2007
MS-22 : HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
1. Define and describe three Ss of organizational Development- Briefly discuss the process of formulating the Organisational Development Plan.
2. What is Compensation System ? What considerations are taken into account in designing a reward system ? Explain with example.
3. Define and describe Diversity and Power. Briefly discuis the cultural, structural and behavioural influences on Diversity and Power, with examples.
4. Enumerate and briefly describe the evaluation criteria against which 'HRD' is assessed for attaining the status of a 'Profession'. Explain with example.
5. Write short notes on any three of the following :
(a) Knowledge Management
(b) Developing Business Ethics
(c) Horizontal re-skilling
(d) Role of Trade Unions in HRD
(e) Basic processes of Coaching
6- Read the following case carefuily and answer the questions given at the end.
Microelectronics, a carifornia-based electronics defense contractor, has enjoyed a smooth growth curve over the past five years,' primarily because of favourable defense funding during the Reagan administration's build-up of u.s. military defenses. Microerectronics has had numerous contracts to design and develop guidance and radar systems for military weaponry. Although the favorable funding cycle has enabled. Microelectronics to grow at a steady rate, the company is finding it increasingly difficult to keep its really good engineers. Based on extensive turnover analyses conducted by Ned Jackson, the human resources planning manager, Microelectronics' problem seems to be its inability to keep engineers beyond the "critical,' five year point. Apparently, the probability of turnover drops dramatically after five years of service. Ned's conclusion is that Microelectronics has been essentially serving as an industry college. Their staffing strategy has always been to hire the best and brightest engineers from the best engineering schools in the United States.
Ned believes that these engineers often get lost in the shuffle at the time they join the firm. For example, most (if not all) of the new hires must work on non-classified projects until cleared by security to join a designated major project. Security clearance usually takes anywhere from six to ten months. In the meantime the major project has started, and these young engineers frequently miss out on its design phase, considered the most creative and challenging segment of the program. Because of the nature of project work, new engineers often have difficulty learning the organizational culture such as who to ask when you have a problem, what the general dos and don'ts are, and why the organization does things in a certain way.
After heading a task force of human resource professionals within Microelectronics, Ned has been designated to present to top management a proposal designed to reduce turnover among young engineering recruits. The essence of his plan is to create a mentor program, except that in this plan the mentors will not be the seasoned graybeards of Microelectronics, but rather those engineers in the critical three-to-five-year service window, the period of highest turnover. These engineers will be paired with new engineering recruits before the recruits actually report to Microelectronics for work.
According to the task force, the programme is twofold ' (1) it benefits the newcomer by easing the transition into the company, and (2\ it helps the three-to-five-year service engineers by enabling them to serve an important role for the company. By performing the mentor role, these .engineers will .become more committed and hence less likely to leave. As Ned prepared his fifteen-minute presentation for top management, he wondered if he had adequately anticipated the possible objections to the program in order to make an intelligent defense of it. Only time would tell.
Questions
(a) Identify the salient issues from HR point of view for this case.
(b) If you were to study this turnover problem, how would you conduct a needs analysis or evolve a counselling programme ?
(c) What are the causes of dissatisfaction and turn over in Microelectronics ?
(d) Do you find the mentoring programme suitable to reduce turnover ? Justify your answer.
